Putting Black Seed In One’s Food: Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: With regards to black seed, is mixing it with food reported in an authentic narration? We have read this in some publications and as a result we hope to seek counsel from you as it relates to this.

A: It is (authentically) reported that contain therein is a cure for all ailments except death consequently there is no doubt with regards to it. Therein is a cure just as the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa salaam- informed us. As for how to apply it, this is up to the discretion of an individual. He can put it in his drink, his food, or swallow it and wash it down with water.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/2534

 

Comments Off on Putting Black Seed In One’s Food: Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

Filed under Nutrition

Is Abandoning The Sunnah Disbelief? Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Is everyone that abandons the sunnah a disbeliever?

A: In this issue there is a detailed explanation. This is due to the fact that on rare occasions a narration may not have reached an individual, or perhaps it reached him and is sound with others but he didn’t consider it to be so. Moreover a narration reaches him which he deems to be sound, however he explains it with that which is apparent to him but not to others, or he interprets it incorrectly, and the correct interpretation is with others. In this case he is excused. Due to this shaykh-ul-Islam authored a book (1) and mention therein those excused in this regard. Consequently if he has an excuse, he is not deemed astray on the contrary it is said that he is mistaken. As for he who is deliberate then there is no doubt that he has either gone astray or disbelieved.  

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/2396


1: The book of Ibn Taymiyah mentioned here is:  رفع الملام عن الأئمة الأعلام

 

Comments Off on Is Abandoning The Sunnah Disbelief? Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

Filed under Uncategorized

The Opinion Of The Majority Is Not Consensus: Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Is the opinion of the majority (of scholars) deemed ijmaa (consensus)?

A: No, the majorities’ opinion is not considered as consensus, it is only deemed as the majorities’ opinion and that’s it. For this reason the four Imams (whenever they all agreed on a matter) it was not said about them they had consensus on the contrary it would be said that they agreed. The four imams had agreement in such and such an issue however it is not said a consensus (among all scholars). An agreement (among the four) is not a consensus (among all the scholars).

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source:  http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/2388

Comments Off on The Opinion Of The Majority Is Not Consensus: Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

Filed under Uncategorized

Opposing Consensus Is Disbelief: Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: What is the meaning of shaykh-ul-Islam’s statement, “Whoever opposes the consensus has disbelieved”?

A: Ah yes, Allah says this:

ومن يشاقق الرسول من بعد ما تبين له الهدى و يتَّبع غيرَ سبيل المؤمنين نولِّهِ ما تولَّى و نصله جهنم و سائت مصيراً

“And whoever opposes the messenger after guidance has been made clear to him and follows a path other than that of the believers We will keep him upon the path he has chosen and will burn him in Hell, an evil destination.” [an-Nisaa: 115] 

This is proof that whoever opposes the consensus has disbelieved.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/2376

Comments Off on Opposing Consensus Is Disbelief: Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan

Filed under Uncategorized

The Traveler Prays With The Residents Of A Locality: Shaykh Salih Al Luhaydan

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: The traveler who seeks to take lodging with a people during his journey yet (while doing so) finds them praying Asr and they have already completed the first two rakat, as a result he enters (catches) the last two. So should he make the tasleem (along with them having only prayed two rakat) or should he complete the full prayer (standing up and praying two more rakat)?

A: He completes it (all four). The traveler whenever he prays along with the residents of a locality his prayer is the same as theirs, whatever he reaches he prays and whatever he missed he completes.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: http://lohaidan.af.org.sa/node/222

Comments Off on The Traveler Prays With The Residents Of A Locality: Shaykh Salih Al Luhaydan

Filed under Prayer

Raising The Hands In Supplication After Every Prayer: Shaykh Salih Alish-Shaykh

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

This is one of many prohibited innovations if the perpetrator takes it as a consistent practice (constantly performing it after every prayer), whereas the sunnah after the obligatory prayer is to remember Allah by seeking His forgiveness, bearing witness that there’s no deity in truth except Him, glorifying Him, praising Him, and exalting Him. Also invoking Him by yourself (not in a communal supplication) with what is authentically reported (in the text) without raising the hands just as the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa salaam- would do and he would not raise his hands during supplication after the obligatory prayers. Thus this should not be done due to it opposing the sunnah and consistent adherence to it is an innovation.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source:  المنظار في بيان كثير الأخطاء الشائعة

Comments Off on Raising The Hands In Supplication After Every Prayer: Shaykh Salih Alish-Shaykh

Filed under Prayer

The Prohibition of Two Transactions In One: Shaykh Salih Alish-Shaykh

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

This type of transaction is prohibited due to that which is narrated upon the authority of Abu Huraira where Allah’s Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa salaam- said, “whoever does two business transactions in one for him is the lesser amount of the two or less it’s usury (ribaa).” Abu Dawud and Ibn Majah narrated this with a sound chain. The expression (of the narrative) found with Ahmad, Tirmidhi, and Nisa’ee is as follows, “The Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa salaam- prohibited two business transactions in one.”

Ibnul Qayyim clarifies the meaning of two business transactions in one (in the book sharh tahdheebis sunan) where he states, “it has been explained to mean, when one says take this merchandise  for ten (dollars, pounds, riyaals, dinaars, etc) upfront or for twenty in a postponed payment (whether the payments are made in installments or paid at one time later on) and it is in reality (the prohibited transaction known as) eenah. This is the meaning to be applied to the narration and surely if the intent is the upfront payment along with the deferred then no one deserves anything except the base price which is the lower amount (taken during an immediate transaction) from the two amounts. So if the seller takes an amount it should be the lower amount and if he takes the higher amount then it’s usury (ribaa). Thus there is no avoiding the lower amount from the two or less it’s usury and the narration has no other probable meaning except this.”  

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source:  المنظار في بيان كثير من الأخطاء الشائعة

Comments Off on The Prohibition of Two Transactions In One: Shaykh Salih Alish-Shaykh

Filed under Halal And Haram

Islamic Shura Is Democracy: Shaykh Muhammad Amaan Al Jaami

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

In this day and age the educated’s circulated mistakes, that which we desire to deter before its sickness becomes irreparable, is their delusion that the advisory council demanded in Islam is the western style democracy. However they are two different affairs that never meet like light and darkness or the day and night. This is due to the fact that democracy is a foreign expression (unheard of in Islam) which means the majority (of people) rules. In other words the people adopt laws for themselves and enact legislation (they feel) is suitable for them without any consideration for Allah’s legislation to a point where the people are the legislative authority. It (as a result) is the worshiped deity and this is completed by way of representatives of parliament who act on behalf of the people.

As for consultation in Islam Allah made it a characteristic of the believer where He states:

و أمرهم شورى بينهم

“…and who conduct their matters by mutual consultation…” [Ash-Shura: 38]

Allah even ordered the Prophet Muhammad -sallahu alayhi wa salaam- to seek it. He the Exalted says:

فَبِمَا رَحْمَةٍ مِّنَ اللَّهِ لِنتَ لَهُمْ وَلَوْ كُنتَ فَظًّا غَلِيظَ الْقَلْبِ لَانفَضُّوا مِنْ حَوْلِكَ فَاعْفُ عَنْهُمْ وَاسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ وَشَاوِرْهُمْ فِي الْأَمْرِ فَإِذَا عَزَمْتَ فَتَوَكَّلْ عَلَى اللَّهِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُتَوَكِّلِينَ

“And by Allah’s mercy you behaved with them gently, and had you been severe and harsh hearted they would have turned away from you; so overlook their faults, seek forgiveness for them, and consult them in affairs. Then when you have made a decision put your trust in Allah, certainly Allah loves those who put their trust in Him.” [Ali-Imran: 159]

Thus the shura in reality is the expressing of an opinion to the consulted whether it be requested or not, and it is not compulsory by agreement of the scholars.

And from the more significant mistakes that we are obligated to be cautioned from is our youth falling into incorrect suspicions concerning the established rule in this Islamic land (Saudi Arabia). They believe it to be the rulings of a dictatorship in which it is binding to convert to a democratic rule. This being based on the influence of some Islamic movements -those who designate themselves as such- whose behavior Islam is free of. These movements along with their varying groups are categorized into two.

The First Category: Those who are ignorant concerning the true nature of democracy and dictatorship. This is a quality embedded in most members of these groups due to their lack of studying (and gaining) comprehension of Islam “whoever Allah wants good for He grants with understanding of the religion.” This category perhaps they are excused due to their ignorance, as a result it is said to them “learn first” because knowledge precedes statement and action. Likewise, from what is said to them is have a proper perception before placing a ruling because rulings being placed on a thing stem from the judges perception of that thing. In addition it should be said to him, “do not excessively praise a thing that you are not fully aware of.”

The Second Category: There is with them knowledge and awareness to the point where they differentiate between truth and falsehood, however their lack of advising the people, and their bad thoughts and evil intent causes them to stray, like that which their behavior manifests clearly and Allah’s aid is sought. Hence it is said to these individuals:

يَا أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ لِمَ تَلْبِسُونَ الْحَقَّ بِالْبَاطِلِ وَتَكْتُمُونَ الْحَقَّ وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ

“O People of the Scripture! Why do you mix truth with falsehood and conceal the truth while you know?” [Ali-Imran: 71]

(this is quoted) due to them knowing that Saudi Arabia only rules by Islam. There is nothing besides that not democracy, not dictatorship, not partisanship. The Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is distinguished by this fact and to Allah belongs all bounty and praise. Also from the distinct traits of the Saudi society is that they are one community, so which party do you see? Is it the head of states party (faction)? No! It is nothing more than a governed community, a governed body by Allah’s legislation in which he revealed in His Book in which no falsehood comes to from before it or behind it. It is sent down by the All-Wise, The One Worthy of Praise.

It is a community that executes Allah’s legislation and they do not legislate anything for themselves. The king of this country and his supporters, ministers, governors, the scholars, judges, law enforcement officers, and every government official are all one community that only have executive authority they do not have legislative authority. It is not permissible in Islam for them to have such, on the contrary the legislation in which we are governed by is Allah’s legislation. Thus we praise Allah for that He who has guided us to this, and never could we find guidance were it not for Allah guiding us. We ask Allah to increase us in bounty. This community just as it believes in Allah’s legislation and is sufficed by it, in addition to that they disbelieve in other legislature. They disbelieve in democracy, dictatorships, and the partisanship of communism. They don’t believe in anything that alters Islam, and if so faith in Allah and His legislation is invalid until one disbelieves in all legislature besides Allah’s. This is implementation of Allah’s statement:

فَمَن يَكْفُرْ بِالطَّاغُوتِ وَيُؤْمِن بِاللَّهِ فَقَدِ اسْتَمْسَكَ بِالْعُرْوَةِ الْوُثْقَىٰ لَا انفِصَامَ لَهَا

 

“So whoever disbelieves in all false deities and believes in Allah then he has grasped the most trust worthy of handholds that will never break.” [Al-Baqara: 256]

And His statement:

أَفَحُكْمَ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ يَبْغُونَ ۚ وَمَنْ أَحْسَنُ مِنَ اللَّهِ حُكْمًا لِّقَوْمٍ يُوقِنُونَ

 

“Do they seek a judgement of ignorance? And who is better in judgement than Allah for a people who have firm faith.” [Al-Maidah: 50]

Consequently there are only two regulations with no third. Allah’s regulations and judgments of ignorance. So a person must pick and be pleased with one of the two, either the rule of Allah or the judgment of ignorance that which conflicts with Allah’s book. Therefore we must state publicly -regarding Allah’s favor- that this community has raised the banner of tawheed and as a result should not submit to any law that contradicts tawheed. Certainly surrendering to man made statutes nullifies tawheed thus there is no judgment except from Allah. In light of this there is no democracy, dictatorship, nor partisanship. Moreover there is no deity in truth except Allah. There is no Lord besides Him, no legislator other than Him, and no law except His.

This is the religion we have embraced, called to, and stand patient as it relates to harms that befall as a result of adopting it. There is neither deception nor obscurity therein and to Allah belongs all praise and bounty. Thus we ask Allah to increase us in sustenance.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source:  حقيقة الشورى في الإسلام    

 

 

Comments Off on Islamic Shura Is Democracy: Shaykh Muhammad Amaan Al Jaami

Filed under Contemporary Issues

Abandoning Takbirul Ihram When Entering The Prayer Late: Shaykh Salih Alish-Shaykh

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

The abandonment of takbirul ihram when entering the prayer while the imam is bowing is a mistake due to the first takbir (which enters one into the prayer) being a pillar (of the prayer) which obligates the performance of it while standing. Afterwards the person enters the bowing position along with the imam (by saying a second takbir moving into the other position). The first takbir is separate from the (second) takbir for (entering) the bowing position. So the takbir for entering the prayer and then one for bowing is more complete and safe as Abu Huraira said, “whenever the Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa salaam- would stand for prayer he would say the takbir then he would say it (again) when bowing.”

Translated: Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source:  المنظار في بيان كثير من الأخطاء الشائعة

Comments Off on Abandoning Takbirul Ihram When Entering The Prayer Late: Shaykh Salih Alish-Shaykh

Filed under Prayer

Are The Ikhwanis From The Saved Sect? Shaykh Abdul Muhsin Al Abbaad

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: These two questions are related to the group known as Ikwanil Muslimeen. Are they considered to be from the saved sect? Or are they considered to be from the Khawaarij?

A: The Ikhwanil Muslimeen have deviations, although they view themselves as being the people of truth and others besides them, however that is not the case based on the statements of the organizer of this group. He stated, “whoever is with us is from us and we are among them and if this is not the case then we are distant from he who is not with us” this is his speech found in some of his published books. Thus they have with them deviations and innovations. They have a yearning for authority (the seat of leadership) and a ravenous appetite for acquiring it. As for Ahlus Sunnah those who are the saved sect that traverse upon the path of the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa salaam- and his companions then they are not from them. 

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: http://www.albaidha.net/vb/showthread.php?t=59008

 

Comments Off on Are The Ikhwanis From The Saved Sect? Shaykh Abdul Muhsin Al Abbaad

Filed under People Of Innovation