An Adult Having An Aqiqah For Himself: Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Is the aqiqah of an adult for himself (something) proven?

A: It is proven within the Sunnah from two chains of transmission on the authority of Anas ibn Malik that the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- performed an aqiqah for himself after being sent as a prophet. Some of the salaf held this opinion and acted accordingly. Ibn Seereen said, “If I knew that he (his father) did not perform an aqiqah on my behalf I would perform it for myself.”

Al Hasan Al Basri said, “If an aqiqah was not performed for you, then perform it for yourself even if you are a man.”

Moreover, it is recommended that a man performs an aqiqah for himself as a substitute for his father, due to the naseekah (aqiqah) being obligatory on the father, and remains so even after reaching old age if it is easy (for him). If he does not do so, a substitute/replacement for him is allowed, due to this being worship related to wealth in which a substitute (to carry out) is legislated. Worship related to wealth allows substitution therein e.g. zakat, donations, and similar to that from worship.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi
Source: أربعون سؤالاً في أحكام المولود

Leave a Comment

Filed under Naseekah (Aqiqah)

The Ruling On The Saliva, Drool, And Vomit Of The Infant: Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: What’s the ruling on the saliva, drool, and vomit of an infant?

A: The fundamental ruling as it relates to objects/things is (a state of) purity. So the infant’s saliva, drool, and vomit are pure, to be more precise the vomit of humans (man or child) is pure as there is no evidence pointing towards its impurity, nor is there anyone fit to be taken as a proof that has conveyed it being impure, on the contrary it is pure. A baby vomits abundantly, its saliva and drool do not cease to flow onto the one providing care for it. Consequently it is an affair in which adversity prevails (as it relates to the removal of these things). Therefore the legislator has not enacted the washing of clothes as it pertains to that. He has not prevented prayer due to it, nor has He ordered being cautioned from the baby’s saliva.

As for the reported consensus that man’s vomit is impure, it is nothing more than an invalid claim due to the opposition of Ibn Hazm where he explicitly states the purity of man’s vomit. Likewise as Imaam Ash-Shawkani and Siddeeq Hasan Khan both did not count vomit along with impurities, on the contrary they held, to be more probable, the purity of man’s vomit in the unrestricted sense. This is due to the fundamental ruling being purity and there is nothing reported about it except  authentic conveyance (concerning its ruling) that are not contradicted by what equals it or (by what) preceded it.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: أربعون سؤالاً في أحكام المولود

Leave a Comment

Filed under Purification

The Ruling Concerning Jamaa’at-ut-Tabligh And Their Dawah: Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Ali Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: What is the ruling pertaining to Jamaa’at-ud-Dawah and Tabligh within the Islamic countries and non Muslim countries?

A: Jamaa’at-ut-Tabligh was initiated based on a dream that its leader Muhammad Ilyaas had. He alleged that, in the dream, the Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- commissioned him with this important task. Moreover this group is established upon six fundamentals that are based on a secret arrangement (understanding and or viewpoint), that being; everything that is the cause of alienation, splitting, and or differing between two Muslims  -even if it’s the truth- then it is severed and abolished from the methodology of the group. 

This group stands in contradiction towards the truth, (they have) a Sufi methodology and disposition, and with them are numerous mistakes. For additional scrutiny refer to the book entitled “A Severe Statement As It Relates To The Warning From Jamaa’at-ut-Tabligh” by the scholar Hammoud ibn Abdillah At-Tuwaijari, and others besides him who have devoted attention towards investigating the modern day Islamic sects. And I ask Allah to cause us to see the truth and to guide us to the path of guidance.

Translated by Abu Abdil Waahid Najeeb ibn Yusuf Al Anjelesi
Source: مجالس تذكيرية على مسائل منهجية

Leave a Comment

Filed under People Of Innovation

Are The Statements And Actions Of The Salaf Proof? Sheikh Muqbil Ibn Haadi

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Are the statement and actions of the pious predecessors proof?

A: No! They are not a proof Allah -The Glorified and Exalted- says:

اتبعوا ما أُنْزِلَ إليكم من ربكم و لا تتبعوا من دونه أولياء قليلاً ما تذكرون

“Follow what has been revealed to you from your Lord and do not follow awliyaa besides Him. Little do you remember.” [Al-A’raf: 3]

The people, as it pertains to this subject, are between being excessive and (between) negligence, i.e. with regards to the significance of the statements of the salaf. From them you have he who disregards their statements and says, “They are men and we are men!” Correct they are men and we are men, however the difference between us and them is like the difference between the sky and the earth, as we seek assistance in their understanding as it pertains to understanding Allah’s book and the sunnah of Allah’s Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam.

Az-Zuhri had a companion, both of them would write the narrations of Allah’s Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- but when they concluded (writing) what reached them from the narrations of Allah’s Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- he (Az-Zuhri) wrote the statements of the companions, while his companion did not believe it to be knowledge. Thus his companion said, “He (Az-Zuhri) prospered and was successful” or similar (to that) in meaning.

Therefore if there was no benefit in them the scholars would neither have compiled them nor quoted them in their authored works, e.g. Ibn Jarir in his tafsir, Ibn Abi Shaiba in his musannaf, Abdur Razzaq in his musannaf, Al-Baihaqi in his sunan, and in an abundance of sunan and in other than them wherein they (the scholars) quote the statements of the salaf. So it is not said that they (the salaf’s statements) have no value, on the contrary we benefit from their understanding, and it is incumbent that we understand Allah’s book and the sunnah of His Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- according to their understanding.

As for it being a proof then no, Allah -The Glorified and Exalted- says:

و ما اختلفْتم فيه من شيءٍ فحكمه إلى الله

“And in whatsoever you differ, the decision is with Allah..” [Ash-Shura: 10]

And He says:

فئن تنازعتم في شيءٍ فردُّوه إلى الله و الرسول

“So if you differ in any matter, refer it to Allah and the Messenger…” [An-Nisaa: 59]

He says:

وأن هذا صراطي مستقيمًا فاتبعوه 
“And this is my straight path so follow it…” [Al-An’am: 153]

He also says:

وما آتاكم الرسول فخذوه
“Whatsoever the Messenger gives you, take it…” [Al-Hashr: 7]

As for the third category, as we have just mentioned two categories i.e. (one of them being) rejecting the statements of the companions and the taabi’een and saying “They are men and we are men” (said) specifically (by) the takfiris. And the other category that exceed limits with regards to it (the salaf’s statements), to justify (opinions and positions) by usage of it, and to make it a proof, this is a mistake due to that which you’ve heard from evidence.

The third category says, “We seek assistance from Allah -The Glorified and Exalted- then with the understanding of our pious predecessors in understanding the book and the sunnah.”

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: https://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&controller=topic&id=105207 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Dawah

Sexual Relations With Multiple Wives In One Night: Sheikh Ubayd Al Jaabiri

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Some (authentic) narrations with regards to polygyny have become problematic for us, like when the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- went to each wife’s house (and had sexual relations with each) and took (only) one bath. So is it permissible for a man to have relations with each of his wives, outside of their turn, and without permission from the other?

A: Allah bestowed upon the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- strength that He did not bestow upon anyone else from his nation. The proof for that is when Thabit asked Anas, “Is he able to do so?” or something similar in expression, and Anas replied, “He has been given the strength of 30 men.” This is the first point.

Second; From what I know of the sunnah of the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- he did this for a purpose, that being while departing for the farewell pilgrimage he spent the night at dhul-hulaifah, there he went to each wife, and Allah knows best with regards to the wisdom (for doing so), but I do not know this to be from his habitual routine in every time. Thus what is apparent to me is that a man is not prevented from doing this with his wives if he plans to travel (away from them) for a long duration, and he is able to do this. Subsequently I have found within the sunnah that he -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- did this many times as is clearly recorded of the narration in the annotation beneath it. This is one circumstance.

The second circumstance is if one is a resident (not on a journey) and he doesn’t have to travel unexpectedly, along with having the ability to be frequent (in having sex), he doesn’t abandon the wife with right to that night until she becomes tired (exhausted from repeated sex). So if she becomes exerted, afterwards he can go to another (wife). But as long as she is able, even if he wants to enjoy some of his other women outside of their night, he must seek her permission because she is the possessor of that night and the right belongs to her.

Thus as it pertains to these two circumstances the affair is not devoid (of being apart) of (one) of the following two situations:

The first being that the possessor of the night she is able, so he comes to her (repeatedly for relations) and she is not exerted, this circumstnace he cannot go to another without her permission.

The second being that she is exerted and worn out yet with him is energy and as a result he can suffer if he doesn’t do it, thus he can go to some of his women or all of them if he wills.

Questioner: Without permission?

Sheikh Ubayd: Yes, without permission, but the first circumstance necessitates her permission as she is not tired or worn out plus with her is the ability (to keep going), so he seeks her permission because the night belongs to her. However the second circumstance is that she is exerted and worn out.

Questioner: What if she has an excuse (not to have sex)?

Sheikh Ubayd: Meaning if her menstrual cycle comes or post natal bleeding? He likewise seeks her (the woman who has right to the night despite these circumstances) permission.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: التقرير المؤكد بالإجابة على ثلاثين سؤالاً في التعدد 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Marriage

The Ruling Concerning Polygyny In Islam: Sheikh Ubayd Al Jaabiri

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: What is the ruling concerning polygyny in Islam?

Sheikh Ubayd Al Jaabiri: All praises are strictly for Allah, Lord of the existence, and may Allah’s commendations (in lofty gatherings) and peace be upon our prophet Muhammad, his family, and all of his companions.

Now then, undoubtedly it is obligatory upon every male and female Muslim to be pleased with Allah and His Messenger’s judgement. Allah the Exalted says:

وما آتاكم الرسول فخذوه وما نهاكم عنه فانْتهوا

“And whatsoever the messenger gives you take it, and whatsoever he forbids abstain from it.” [Al-Hashr: 7]

And The Exalted says:

وما كان لمؤمن و لا مؤمنةٍ إذا قضى الله و رسوله أمرًا أن يكون لهم الخيرة من أمرهم 

“It is not for a believer male and female to have a choice, if Allah and His messenger have decided a matter…” [Al-Ahzaab: 36]

And other than that from the explicitly suggestive verses that indicate that it is compulsory for every male and female Muslim the being pleased with whatsoever Allah and His Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- have decided, and to hold the belief that it is good. In that manner the sunnah has brought forth, from the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam-, the inciting of the male and female Muslims to being pleased with whatsoever Muhammad has brought forth, regardless if the judgement is contain within a revealed (sent down by Allah from above the seven heavens) noble verse or within the Prophet’s sunnah. From the widely spread sunnah is that which the two scholars compiled on the authority of Anas, from the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam where he said, “3 things if gathered within one finds the sweetness of faith; that Allah and His Messenger are more beloved to him than anyone besides them…”

The meaning is that you put whatsoever pleases Allah and His Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- before the statements of anyone, as is in the authentic narration, “Whoever is pleased with Allah as his Lord, Islam as his religion, and Muhammad as his messenger has savored the taste of faith.” Thus his statement “And Muhammad as his messenger” this necessitates that one believes in all of what Muhammad -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- brought forth, that it is from Allah, and that it is the truth in which there is no doubt therein.

And what is better than what Ash-Shaafi’ee stated, “I believe in Allah, what has come from Allah, upon Allah’s intent. I believe in Allah’s Messenger, whatever has come from Allah’s Messenger, upon his -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- intent. Indeed the Islamic knowledge based specialist unanimously agree on what we have mentioned, hence it is determined. So undoubtedly polygyny is the foundation (of marriage in Islam), it is explicit within the distinguished revelation. Allah the Exalted says:

فانْكحوا ما طاب لكم من النساء مثنى و ثلاثى و رباع فإن خفتم ألاَّ تعدلوا فواحدةً

“So marry whatever you have a liking for from the women, two, three, or four. But if you fear that you cannot be just then (marry) one…” [An-Nisaa: 3]

The one who examines this valuable verse, made clear to him are two things:

First: That the foundation is polygyny as Allah began with it and encouraged it. Whoever speaks with it being obligatory, then his speech has a bases for consideration because the fundamental ruling regarding a command is obligation.

Second: Contentment with one (wife) for he who fears for himself the absence of justice (between multiple wives).

 

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: التقرير المؤكد بالإجابة على ثلاثين سؤالاً في التعدد 

   

Leave a Comment

Filed under Marriage

Being In A State Of Ritual Purity Is Recommended When Calling The Adhan: Sheikh Al-Albaani

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

While discussing recommended actions while calling the adhan Sheikh Al-Albaani said, “That one calls to prayer while in a state of purity (wudhu), and the evidence for this is his -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- statement, ‘Indeed I hate to remember Allah unless while in a state of purity‘ or he said, ‘while in purification.
As for the narration, ‘There is no adhan unless one is in a state of purity‘ this is weak, it is not authentic, and Tirmidhi collected it. Thereafter Tirmidhi said, ‘The people of knowledge differ as it pertains to the adhan in other than a state of purity, thus some people of knowledge hate doing so as Ash-Shaafi’ee and Ishaq state. Some of the people of knowledge permit it as Sufyaan Ath-Thawri, Ibn-ul-Mubaarak, and Ahmad speak accordingly.’ “

Sheikh Al-Albaani said in the footnotes to the previous narration collected by Tirmidhi, “It is from the chain of Muawiyah ibn Yahya As-Sudfi from Az-Zuhri from Abu Huraira being raised to him (The Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam) Muawiya is weak just as Al-Haafidh stated, and Az-Zuhri didn’t hear anything from Abu Huraira just as Tirmidhi mentions. Then he compiled it with the chain of Yunus (another chain of transmission) from Ibn Shihaab where he said, ‘Abu Huraira said, ‘No one makes the call to prayer except he who is in a state of purification.’ ‘ ” Thereafter he said, ‘This is more sound than the first narration.’ “

I say (Al-Albaani), “It is not valid in regards to being marfoo (having a connected chain towards the Prophet -sllahu alayhi wa sallam), nor in being mawqoof (a connected chain towards a companion) due to the existence of a break in both chains.”

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: أحكام الأذان والإقامة

   

Leave a Comment

Filed under Adhan And Iqaamah

Kindness Towards Animals: Sheikh Zayd Al Madkhali

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Abu Huraira narrated the statement of Allah’s Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam-, “While a man was walking on a road he was stricken with severe thirst. He stumbled upon a well and descended therein, consequently drinking (until his thirst was quenched) and then exited it. Meanwhile he saw a dog panting and licking mud due to thirst. As a result the man said, ‘Thirst has affected this dog like that which affected me.’ So he descended into the well and filled his footwear with water, grasping it by his mouth, then he gave it water to drink. Consequently Allah thanked and forgave him.” They (those present) said, “O Messenger of Allah! Is there reward for us as a result of animals? He -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- said, “In every sentient being/creature there is a reward.” Collected by Al Bukhari and Muslim.

Sheikh Zayd Al Madkhali said, “This narration is a proof for the obligation of mercy towards animals and occasionally it is highly recommended. As the story in which a man saw a dog, and the dog is the least of animals in value, being that it was panting out of thirst he climbed down into a well in order to give it water. Consequently this became a means for receiving Allah’s mercy and thanks and He forgave him for his sins. In another chain of transmission there is a woman prostitute in which the same thing transpired with her, thus she was forgiven as well.

Therefore the narration therein is a clarification with regards to livestock owned by man, that he is responsible for them and they are from his herd (that which is placed under his care or custody). Thus it is mandatory to establish what is binding for them from food and drink, and having the concern that is befitting in that regard. If he does that for him is reward, but if he neglects that upon him is sin. In fact, when the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- was asked about giving food or drink to animals he responded by saying, ‘In every sentient being/creature there is a reward.’ Along with the differing in species of created beings, everything man feeds or waters is included and there is for him a reward despite the different species. Whether it is livestock/cattle or animals that pass by your homes like cats and dogs, in all of them is reward.

So a man intends and expects that whatever is consumed from his money or substances of his drunken therein is reward.”

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: عون الأحد الصمد شرح الأدب المفرد 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Covering The Mouth While Yawning: Sheikh Zayd Al Madkhali

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

On the authority of Abu Saeed (Sa’d ibn Malik ibn Sinan) Al Khudri, the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- said, “Whenever one of you yawns, then place his hands on his mouth as the devil enters through it.”

Ibn Abbas narrated the statement of Allah’s Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam: “Whenever one yawns then place his hand over his mouth, indeed it (yawning) is only from the devil.”

Both narrations are collected by Imaam Al Bukhari in his book entitled “Al-Adab Al-Mufrad” and both are graded as authentic.

Sheikh Zayd Al Madkhali said, “This narration indicates the dislike of yawning and the obligation of suppression, and it is to repel yawning, to place the hand over the mouth, and to prevent raising the voice during yawning. The ruling brought forth in these narrations is coupled with its reason. The ruling is the obligation of suppression during yawning, thus whoever yawns should place his hand over his mouth so that it does not open as the devil enters through it. It is as the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- said about him, ‘He flows through the son of Adam by way of the blood vessels.’

Therefore it is compulsory on the Muslim to put his hand over his mouth, and it is not permissible to utter anything. No remembrance, no speech, no screech, on the contrary he suppresses so that he does not ever say anything, in order to safeguard himself from the affliction of the devil.”

Translated by Najeeb ibn Yusuf Al Anjelesi

Source: عون الأحد الصمد شرح الأدب المفرد 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Halal And Haram

Praying A Voluntary Prayer During The Iqaamah: Sheikh Abdul Aziz Ibn Baaz

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: We hope to receive, from your eminence, a simplified explanation to the narration, “When the prayer is established (i.e., the iqaamah is called) there is no prayer except the obligatory prayer.”

A: The narration is upon its apparent meaning, and Muslim reported it in his authentic collection. The meaning, “When the prayer is established” i.e., if the caller to prayer starts to call the iqaamah, whoever is praying consequently breaks his voluntary prayer regardless if it be a optional prayer connect to a compulsory or if it’s greeting the masjid he (the praying person) breaks it and busies himself with preparation for entering the obligatory prayer. He does not begin a prayer subsequent to the iqaamah, on the contrary he breaks the prayer he is currently in and is prevented from entering into a new one, due to the obligatory prayer being of greater importance. This is the meaning of this authentic narration from the most valid of the scholars statements.

Some of the people of knowledge say do not break it but complete it briskly. They use as a proof the glorified and exalted’s statement:

يأيها الذين ءامنوا أطيعوا الله و أطيعوا الرسول و لا تبطلوا أعمالكم

“O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the messenger and do not nullify your actions.” [Muhammad: 33]

However he who says break it, and it is the correct statement exactly as presented, has responded to the noble verse by stating that it is general and this (the command of the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam) is specific. Thus the specification takes precedence over the generality and it does not contradict it. This is a significant and well known principle with the people of knowledge in which its examples (regarding its application) are abundant.

It is also said that His statement…and do not nullify your actionsits intent is the prohibition on nullification of actions by way of apostasy, and this issue is not apostasy. In any case, the verse is general and the breaking of the prayer that one is performing at the time of the iqaamah its evidence is specific and the particularization takes precedents over the general, it does not contradict it.

This is what we believe and accordingly issue verdicts with, that being that if a person praying voluntarily, and the iqaamah is called, he breaks his prayer and does not complete it unless he is at the end of it. He has performed the second bowing (in the second portion or unit of prayer), or is in prostration, or is performing the tashahhud, then he completes it, due to him being in the least part of the prayer and there does not remain except but a small portion than he completes it and this does not contradict the previously mentioned narration. And that is better and it does not oppose the authentic narration.

Translated by Najeeb ibn Yusuf Al Anjelesi

Source: http://www.binbaz.org.sa/fatawa/1077

   

  

Leave a Comment

Filed under Prayer