Monthly Archives: October 2017

Quranic Verses That Point To The Lack Of Association With The People Of Innovation

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

The following is a compilation of some Quranic verses that illustrate the prohibition of association with the people of innovation, I believe it is of great importance to the Salafi to know and understand these verses especially since many among us when asked, “Why should we stay away from the people of innovation?” They reply with imam so and so said, or sheikh so and so said yet an imam or sheikh’s statements are not proof, the proof is the Quran and Sunnah, and this prohibition is found in both. Thus I seek Allah’s aid and assistance in presenting some of the verses that point to this and I hope Allah makes it a source of benefit for my brothers and sisters from Ahlus Sunnah. 

1: Ali-Imran: 7

هو الذي أنزل عليك الكتاب منه آياتٌ محكماتٌ هن أم الكتاب و أُخر متسابهاتٌ فأما الذين في قلوبهم زيغٌ فيتبعون ما تشابه منه ابتغاء الفتنة وابتغاء تأويله و ما يعلم تأويله إلا الله

It is He Who has revealed to you the Book (Al-Quran), therein are verses that are clear and or distinct (in meaning), they are the mother of the book, yet others (i.e. verses) that are not as clear. As for those who have within their hearts deviation they follow that which is not explicitly clear seeking (by way of it) trials (confusion) and seeking (false) interpretation, but none knows its meanings except Allah….

Ibn Kathir said, “The Exalted mentions that within the Quran are explicitly clear verses that are the mother of the book, i.e. plain and evident meaning with no obscurity therein for anyone. Likewise therein are other verses that have within them dubiousness as it pertains to their meaning with an abundance of people. Thus whoever refers what is unclear back to the distinct of it, holding the opinion about the unclear by use of the clear consequently is guided, and whoever does the opposite achieves being opposite/reversed, for this reason the Exalted says, ‘They are the mother of the book i.e. its foundation in which it is returned to during confusion (as it pertains to other verses therein). -Yet others that are not clear- i.e. its meaning potentially being in accordance with the explicitly clear (verse), or less likely meaning something else with respect to the expression and construction (of the phrase and or sentence) but not with regards to the intent.”

He also said about Allah’s statement, -As for those who have within their hearts deviation- “i.e. straying and or departing from the truth to falsehood.” -They follow that which is not explicitly clear- “i.e. from it (the Book) they only take the unclear that which is possible for them to alter to their corrupt meanings and they refer it (the verse) to the corrupt interpretation due to the probability of its expression. As for the explicitly clear, there is no opportunity for them with regards to it (i.e. alteration thereof) because for them it is a repellent, and proof against them. On account of this Allah the Exalted says, -seeking (by way of it) trials- i.e. the misleading of their followers by deceiving them as if they use the Quran as an argument to support their innovation whereas it is a proof against them not for them.

Similar to if the Christians use the Quran due to the fact that it mentions that Esa is Allah’s spirit and word imposed upon Mary and a spirit from Him, yet abandon usage of His statement:

إن هو إلا عبد أنعمنا عليه

He is nothing more than a servant whom We bestowed Our favor on

And His statement:

إن مثل عيسى عند الله كمثل آدم خلقه من تراب ثم قال له كن فيكون

Indeed the likeness of Esa with Allah is like the likeness of Adam. He created him from dirt then said to him be and he was.

And other than that from the explicitly clear verses that indicate that he is a creature from Allah’s creation, a servant and messenger from Allah’s messengers. The Exalted’s statement, -and seeking (false) interpretation- i.e. altering it to fit what they desire.” 

Ibn Kathir has clearly highlighted those intended by Allah’s speech concerning they in which whose hearts there is deviation, they are as Allah says those who follow the verses that are unclear in meaning and intent due to the intent having multiple possibilities. Thus they cling to these types of verses and throw behind their backs the other verses that make clear Allah’s intent in order to substantiate their clashing with the text. This undoubtedly is a characteristic of every person of innovation. In light of this, the question remains, “How is this used as proof to disassociation with the people of innovation?” For the answer one must turn to the sunnah of Allah’s messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam.   

It is recorded within the authentic collections of both Imam Al-Bukhari and Imam Muslim a narration on the authority of Ayesha, therein she stated that the Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam recited this verse and thereafter said, “If you all see those who follow that which is not explicitly clear, they are those whom Allah has named (as having deviation) so beware of them!” Imam An-Nawawi said, “Contain within this narration is the warning from intermingling with the people of deviation, innovation, and whomsoever follows the uncertain for the purpose of trouble (fitna).” Al-Haafidh mentions similar as he said, “The intent is the warning from hearkening towards those who follow the unclear verses of the Quran.” In further illustration of this point he said, “The first to demonstrate this in Islam was the Khawaarij insomuch that it is reported from Ibn Abbas that he interpreted this verse to mean them.” Thus this is a prophetic directive from our Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- on how the verse is understood and applied, it is a warning and or prohibition from association with the people of innovation.

2: Al-An’am: 68

وإذَا رأيت الذين يخوضون في آياتنا فأعرض عنهم حتى يخوضوا في حديثٍ غيره و إما ينسينك الشيطان فلا تقعد بعد الذكرى مع القوم الظالمين

And whenever you see those who speak blasphemously about Our verses, shun them until they change the topic of discussion. If the Shaitan causes you to forget, do not sit with, subsequent to remembering, with an oppressive people. 

Ibn Kathir said, “The intent is that every individual, from the tens of thousands of this nation, is not to sit with those that deny by way of altering Allah’s verses and placing them in other than their (proper) place. If anyone sits with them forgetfully -do not sit with, subsequent to remembering- i.e. after recollection -with an oppressive people.

Sheikh Abdur Rahman ibn Naasir As-Sa’idi said, “The intent of speaking blasphemously about Allah’s verses is the speaking with that which opposes the truth, i.e. beautification of false statements, inviting to it, praising its people, shunning the truth, and belittlement of it (the truth) and its people. Hence Allah order His Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- fundamentally, and his nation subsequently to shun and be absent from the gatherings of those who speak with falsehood whenever they see someone blasphemously speaking about Allah’s verses, in addition to being persistent with regards to that until they discuss and or converse about something else. If the speech is regarding something else, the aforementioned prohibition ceases.”

Imam Ash-Shawkani said, “Therein is a tremendous admonition for he who is lenient with regards to the social gatherings of the innovators those who alter Allah’s speech and play games with His Book and the sunnah of His Messenger. They refer these two back to their astray desires and corrupt innovation. Thus if he does not disapprove of them and change what they’re indulging in, then at the very minimum he can abandon their social gatherings as that is easy for him and not difficult.”

3: Al-Kahf: 28

واصبر نفسك مع الذين يدعون ربهم بالغدوة و العشىى يريدون وجهه ولا تعد عيناك عنهم تريد زينةَ الحياةِ الدنيا ولا تطع من أغفلنا قلبه عن ذكرنا واتبع هواه و كان أمره فرطا

Be patient with those who invoke their Lord  during the morning and afternoon sincerely seeking His Face, and do not allow your eyes to overlook them desiring the adornments of the worldly life, furthermore do not obey he whose heart We caused to be negligent with regards to Our remembrance and who follows his desires as his affair has been wasted.

Sheikh Abdur Rahman ibn Naasir As-Sa’idi said, “He neglected Allah, as a consequence Allah caused him to be negligent with regards to His remembrance. -and who follows his desires- He becomes pursuant to his desires wherein whatsoever it desires he does. So he puts forth efforts in obtaining it (the desired) even if within that thing is his destruction and loss, he consequently has taken his desires as his lord, just as the Exalted said:

“Have you not seen he who has taken his desires as his lord? And Allah knowingly left him astray…” [Al-Jaathiyah: 23]

-and his affair- Meaning; the matter of his religion and worldly affairs -has been wasted- lost and or nullified. Thus this is he whom Allah has forbade obedience, due to obedience to him leading to following him and he not inviting to anything except that with which he is described (i.e. heedlessness to Allah’s remembrance, following desires, etc).”

Sheikh Muhammad ibn Saalih Al-Uthaymin said, “The Exalted said -do not obey he whose heart is negligent with regards to Our remembrance- his remembrance of Us or the remembrance which We have sent down. So with regards to the first (suggested meaning), its intent is that a person remembers Allah with his tongue but not with his heart. The intent of the second is that Allah has caused the man’s heart to be heedless of the Quran, thus he does not raise his head for it (i.e. he does not care), nor does he view any harm in (being in) opposition towards it.” [تفسير القرآن الكريم سورة الكهف]

This verse was revealed as a result of the request by notables from among the idolaters. They wanted the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- to expel whom they considered to be of lesser class from a gathering between him -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- and them, hence Allah referred to them as having hearts negligent to His remembrance, followers of their desires, and their affair being wasted. Thus some may ask how this verse, with its specific reason for being revealed, be applicable to the people of innovation? The answer is the following principle:

العبرة بعموم الألفاظ لا بخصوص الأسباب

The Consideration Is In The Generality Of The Text, Not In The Specified Reason (why it was revealed) 

Sheikh Muhammad ibn Saalih Al-Uthaymin said, “If a verse was revealed for a specified reason yet its verbal expression is general, its ruling encompasses that reason and all of what its verbal expression includes because the Quran was sent down as a general(ly applied) legislation for the entire Islamic nation, as a result the consideration is in the generality of the text, not the specified reason (of its revealing). [شرح أصول في التفسير]

Therefore this verse is justifiable applicable to the people of innovation due to their hearts being heedless of the Quran may standing in opposition towards it, by way of utilizing the unclear verses and preferring them over the clear, manifest, distinct, and unambiguous ones. Due to them being severe followers of their desires despite the truth being made clear to them, and due to their innovated practices being null and void, consequently bearing them no fruit, thus their affair is wasted. 

4: Al-Jaathiyah: 18

ثم جعلناك على شرية من الأمر فاتبعها ولا تتبع أهواء الذين لا يعلمون

Then We have placed you upon a path/way from (Our) command so follow it, and do not follow the desires of those who don’t know.

Imam At-Tabari said, “Do not follow what the ignorant invite you to as it relates to Allah, they who do not know truth from falsehood. As a result (of following them) you enact it (that which they instruct), and consequently become ruined if you enact it.”

Sheikh Abdur Rahman ibn Naasir As-Sa’idi said about the verse, “Then We prescribed for you a complete path that invites to all good and prohibits all evil, all of which being from Our legislative command. -so follow it- Undoubtedly the result of following it is everlasting bliss and success. -and do not follow the desires of those who don’t know- Those whose desires are not pursuant to knowledge nor trailing behind it, on the contrary they are every individual whose want and desire opposes the Messenger’s -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- legislation. Therefore it is from the desires of those that know not.” 

Sheikh Muhammad Al-Amin Ash-Shinqeeti said, “The Quranic evidence makes clear that although the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- is the one being addressed, the intent is it being a prescribed law for his nation. This is within the previously cited verse of Bani Israel (i.e. Al-Israa: 22) and is included within this verse of Al-Jaathiyah from the prohibition of following their desires as it is clearly reported in an abundance of verses..”

5: Al-Mujaadilah: 22

لا تجد قومًا يؤمنون بالله واليوم الأخر يوادون من حادَّ الله و رسوله و لو كانوا ءاباءهم أو أبناءهم أو إخوانهم أو عشيرتهم

You will not find a people who believe in Allah and the Last Day befriending those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, even if they be their fathers, sons, brothers, or kinfolk….

Imam At-Tabaraani said, “It means; you will not find a people who affirm the oneness of Allah, and resurrection after death consoling and seeking affection from whomsoever opposes Allah and His Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- in the religion, even if it’s their relatives by lineage. Thus without doubt disavowal from the opponents of Allah is obligatory.

Imam Al-Qurtubi said, “Imam Maalik used this verse as proof for hatred towards the Qadariyyah and abandonment of their social gatherings. Ashab quotes Maalik where he said, ‘Do not sit with the Qadaris and have hate for them for Allah’s sake due to the Exalted’s statement -You will not find a people who believe in Allah and the Last Day befriending those who oppose Allah and His Messenger-‘ ” Thus the intent concerning the people of qadr is every people of oppression and wrong doing.”   

And Allah knows best.
Compiled by Najeeb ibn Yusuf Al Anjelesi


All statements from Imam At-Tabari, Imam At-Tabaraani, Imam Al-Qurtubi, Imam Ash-Shawkani, Sheikh Muhammad Al-Amin Ash-Shinqeeti, and Sheikh Abdur Rahman ibn Naasir As-Sa’idi are taken from their well known, famous, and highly depended upon tafsirs of the Quran. 

       

Leave a Comment

Filed under Tafsir

Who Has More Right To Name The Child: Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Who has more right with regards to naming the child, the father or mother?

A: There is no differing between the people that the naming of the child is the father’s right and not the mother’s. This is because the child is attributed to him (through lineage), thus he has more right to name him. Likewise, just as it is binding upon him to spend, educate, perform the aqiqah, etc the naming also is for him. As a result the creation, on the day of resurrection, will be summoned by their fathers’ names and not their mothers. One will only be affixed to his mother in terms of when a husband accuses his wife of having a child through adultery (And they both bear witness that the other is lying), fornication, and other situations from the known affairs in Islamic jurisprudence.

Translated by Abu Abdil Waahid Najeeb ibn Yusuf Al Anjelesi
Source: أربعون سؤالاً في أحكام المولود  

Leave a Comment

Filed under Child Matters

Is Naming A Child Restricted To The Seventh Day After Birth: Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Is it permissible to name the newborn on other than the seventh day (after birth), like naming him on the first day?

A: What has preceded within the previous narrations (quoted within the book) is the recommendation for naming the newborn on the seventh day, due to the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- ordering -on the seventh day after its birth- its naming as well as its aqiqah along with the removal of harm (shaving), just as it is reported in the narration of Sumra: “Every newborn is subject to have an aqiqah (on its behalf), sacrifice is performed for him on his seventh day (after birth), he is shaved, and given a name.”

However it is permissible to give him a name at the time of birth due to what is reported in the narration of Abu Musa where he said, “A son of mines was born, so I brought him to the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- and he named him Ibrahim and rubbed the interior of his mouth with a date.” Also in the authentic collection of Muslim, on the authority of Anas, the Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- said, “A child of mines was born this night and I named him after my father Ibrahim…” Also the narration of Sahl ibn Sad As-Saa’idi found within the two authentic collections, where he said, “Mundhir ibn Abi Usayd was brought to Allah’s Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- when he was born and placed on his lap while Abu Usayd sat. The Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- was preoccupied with something in front of him, so Abu Usayd told someone to removed his son from the Prophet’s lap. Afterwards the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- asked, “Where is the child?” Abu Usayd replied, “We sent him home O Messenger.” He -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- said, “What is his name?” Abu Usayd replied, “His name is so-and-so.” The Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- said, “No! His name is Mundhir.”

These narrations indicate the allowance as it relates to naming the newborn on the day of its birth, but what is best is to delay it if possible to the seventh day based on it being a verbally expressed sunnah.

Translated by Abu Abdil Wahid Najeeb Al Anjelesi
Source: أربعون سؤالاً في أحكام المولود 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Child Matters

An Adult Having An Aqiqah For Himself: Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: Is the aqiqah of an adult for himself (something) proven?

A: It is proven within the Sunnah from two chains of transmission on the authority of Anas ibn Malik that the Prophet -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- performed an aqiqah for himself after being sent as a prophet. Some of the salaf held this opinion and acted accordingly. Ibn Seereen said, “If I knew that he (his father) did not perform an aqiqah on my behalf I would perform it for myself.”

Al Hasan Al Basri said, “If an aqiqah was not performed for you, then perform it for yourself even if you are a man.”

Moreover, it is recommended that a man performs an aqiqah for himself as a substitute for his father, due to the naseekah (aqiqah) being obligatory on the father, and remains so even after reaching old age if it is easy (for him). If he does not do so, a substitute/replacement for him is allowed, due to this being worship related to wealth in which a substitute (to carry out) is legislated. Worship related to wealth allows substitution therein e.g. zakat, donations, and similar to that from worship.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi
Source: أربعون سؤالاً في أحكام المولود

Leave a Comment

Filed under Naseekah (Aqiqah)

The Ruling On The Saliva, Drool, And Vomit Of The Infant: Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: What’s the ruling on the saliva, drool, and vomit of an infant?

A: The fundamental ruling as it relates to objects/things is (a state of) purity. So the infant’s saliva, drool, and vomit are pure, to be more precise the vomit of humans (man or child) is pure as there is no evidence pointing towards its impurity, nor is there anyone fit to be taken as a proof that has conveyed it being impure, on the contrary it is pure. A baby vomits abundantly, its saliva and drool do not cease to flow onto the one providing care for it. Consequently it is an affair in which adversity prevails (as it relates to the removal of these things). Therefore the legislator has not enacted the washing of clothes as it pertains to that. He has not prevented prayer due to it, nor has He ordered being cautioned from the baby’s saliva.

As for the reported consensus that man’s vomit is impure, it is nothing more than an invalid claim due to the opposition of Ibn Hazm where he explicitly states the purity of man’s vomit. Likewise as Imaam Ash-Shawkani and Siddeeq Hasan Khan both did not count vomit along with impurities, on the contrary they held, to be more probable, the purity of man’s vomit in the unrestricted sense. This is due to the fundamental ruling being purity and there is nothing reported about it except  authentic conveyance (concerning its ruling) that are not contradicted by what equals it or (by what) preceded it.

Translated by Najeeb Al Anjelesi

Source: أربعون سؤالاً في أحكام المولود

Leave a Comment

Filed under Purification

The Ruling Concerning Jamaa’at-ut-Tabligh And Their Dawah: Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Ali Ferkous

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Q: What is the ruling pertaining to Jamaa’at-ud-Dawah and Tabligh within the Islamic countries and non Muslim countries?

A: Jamaa’at-ut-Tabligh was initiated based on a dream that its leader Muhammad Ilyaas had. He alleged that, in the dream, the Messenger -sallahu alayhi wa sallam- commissioned him with this important task. Moreover this group is established upon six fundamentals that are based on a secret arrangement (understanding and or viewpoint), that being; everything that is the cause of alienation, splitting, and or differing between two Muslims  -even if it’s the truth- then it is severed and abolished from the methodology of the group. 

This group stands in contradiction towards the truth, (they have) a Sufi methodology and disposition, and with them are numerous mistakes. For additional scrutiny refer to the book entitled “A Severe Statement As It Relates To The Warning From Jamaa’at-ut-Tabligh” by the scholar Hammoud ibn Abdillah At-Tuwaijari, and others besides him who have devoted attention towards investigating the modern day Islamic sects. And I ask Allah to cause us to see the truth and to guide us to the path of guidance.

Translated by Abu Abdil Waahid Najeeb ibn Yusuf Al Anjelesi
Source: مجالس تذكيرية على مسائل منهجية

Leave a Comment

Filed under People Of Innovation